Exclusive Content:

Haiper steps out of stealth mode, secures $13.8 million seed funding for video-generative AI

Haiper Emerges from Stealth Mode with $13.8 Million Seed...

Running Your ML Notebook on Databricks: A Step-by-Step Guide

A Step-by-Step Guide to Hosting Machine Learning Notebooks in...

“Revealing Weak Infosec Practices that Open the Door for Cyber Criminals in Your Organization” • The Register

Warning: Stolen ChatGPT Credentials a Hot Commodity on the...

The Tale of a Poor Train-Test Split

Unveiling Bias in Train-Test Split Procedure: The Story of Thumbnail Integration

The Pitfalls of Data Leakage in Train-Test Split Procedure

About a year ago, our team decided to incorporate thumbnails as a new feature in our content recommendation model. This was a significant step as we had been relying solely on item titles and metadata features up until that point. Little did we know, this decision would lead us down a path of data leakage and bias in our train-test split procedure.

Setting the Scene

When working with multiple types of features in a unified model, such as titles and thumbnails, it’s crucial to be aware of the potential for data leakage. In our case, many items shared the same thumbnail or title, making it impossible to apply a random split to our dataset. This meant that our model could potentially memorize titles/thumbnails from the training set and perform well on the test set without truly generalizing.

First Attempt

Our initial approach to solving the data leakage issue seemed simple enough. We marked all rows in the dataset as “train” and then iteratively converted rows to “test” until we reached our desired split ratio. However, despite our efforts, we began to notice unexpected results in our model performance on the test set.

And Then Things Escalated

Upon further investigation, we discovered that our new split method was biased towards selecting larger components for the test set. This led to significant discrepancies in model performance between the title-only model and the model that incorporated thumbnails. Our initial assumption that the split method would not impact the title-only model’s performance was proven wrong.

Second Try

Realizing our mistake, we refined our approach by sampling connected components instead of individual rows for the test set. This ensured that each component had an equal probability of being selected for the test set, eliminating the bias we had previously encountered.

Key Takeaway

The way you split your dataset into train-test sets can have a significant impact on the performance and generalization of your model. It’s essential to be mindful of data leakage and bias when working with multiple types of features. By understanding the nuances of your dataset and implementing proper splitting methods, you can ensure more accurate and reliable model performance.

Ultimately, our journey towards incorporating thumbnails into our model served as a valuable learning experience. As we continue to refine our models and explore new features, we will remain vigilant in our approach to data splitting to prevent any issues of bias or data leakage.

Originally published by me at engineering.taboola.com.

Latest

Optimizing Performance: Load Testing SageMaker AI Endpoints Using Observe.AI’s Testing Tool

Optimizing Machine Learning Infrastructure with OLAF and Amazon SageMaker A...

Here’s what it conveyed.

Alternative Investments to Gold: Insights and Recommendations for 2025 Exploring...

AI-Driven “Agent” Solution Enhances Efficiency, Offering Airlines Better Planning Insights and Decision-Making Abilities

AI-Powered "Agent" Solution Enhances Airline Efficiency and Decision-Making Published on...

Don't miss

Haiper steps out of stealth mode, secures $13.8 million seed funding for video-generative AI

Haiper Emerges from Stealth Mode with $13.8 Million Seed...

Running Your ML Notebook on Databricks: A Step-by-Step Guide

A Step-by-Step Guide to Hosting Machine Learning Notebooks in...

VOXI UK Launches First AI Chatbot to Support Customers

VOXI Launches AI Chatbot to Revolutionize Customer Services in...

Investing in digital infrastructure key to realizing generative AI’s potential for driving economic growth | articles

Challenges Hindering the Widescale Deployment of Generative AI: Legal,...

Optimizing Performance: Load Testing SageMaker AI Endpoints Using Observe.AI’s Testing Tool

Optimizing Machine Learning Infrastructure with OLAF and Amazon SageMaker A Collaborative Journey with Aashraya Sachdeva from Observe.ai Leveraging SageMaker for Efficient ML Development The Challenge: Managing Scale...

Analyzing Sentiment Through Text and Audio with AWS Generative AI Services:...

Unlocking Customer Insights: A Comprehensive Guide to Sentiment Analysis with AWS and ICTi Enhancing Customer Experience through Emotional Intelligence in Text and Audio This post is...

Boosting LLM Inference Speed with Post-Training Weight and Activation Optimization Using...

Scaling Foundation Models: Harnessing the Power of Quantization for Efficient Deployment The Rapid Expansion of Language Models and Its Challenges The Importance of Post-Training Quantization (PTQ)...